<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Documents vs. Windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.rw-designer.com/2009/01/documents-vs-windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.rw-designer.com/2009/01/documents-vs-windows/</link>
	<description>Discover what's the RealWorld all about.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vlasta</title>
		<link>http://blog.rw-designer.com/2009/01/documents-vs-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-7438</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlasta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rw-designer.com/2009/01/documents-vs-windows/#comment-7438</guid>
		<description>Thanks to all for your opinions. It seems that tabs would be a good thing and I will add them to the long term plan. They may not make it into the next version, but who knows...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to all for your opinions. It seems that tabs would be a good thing and I will add them to the long term plan. They may not make it into the next version, but who knows&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Club559</title>
		<link>http://blog.rw-designer.com/2009/01/documents-vs-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-7434</link>
		<dc:creator>Club559</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 20:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rw-designer.com/2009/01/documents-vs-windows/#comment-7434</guid>
		<description>I shall give my opinion in percentages.
Tabbed: %50
Windows In Main Frame: %45
Window By Window: %5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I shall give my opinion in percentages.<br />
Tabbed: %50<br />
Windows In Main Frame: %45<br />
Window By Window: %5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Hoffman</title>
		<link>http://blog.rw-designer.com/2009/01/documents-vs-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-7432</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Hoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rw-designer.com/2009/01/documents-vs-windows/#comment-7432</guid>
		<description>Tabs. Definitely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tabs. Definitely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Er Jin Jang</title>
		<link>http://blog.rw-designer.com/2009/01/documents-vs-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-7427</link>
		<dc:creator>Er Jin Jang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 04:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rw-designer.com/2009/01/documents-vs-windows/#comment-7427</guid>
		<description>The program is great and powerful. However, I would suggest using tabs for future versions. However, I would like to limit the number of tabs in one window.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The program is great and powerful. However, I would suggest using tabs for future versions. However, I would like to limit the number of tabs in one window.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob R. Huempfner</title>
		<link>http://blog.rw-designer.com/2009/01/documents-vs-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-7426</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob R. Huempfner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 03:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rw-designer.com/2009/01/documents-vs-windows/#comment-7426</guid>
		<description>I would like a tabbed interface.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like a tabbed interface.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.rw-designer.com/2009/01/documents-vs-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-7425</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 03:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rw-designer.com/2009/01/documents-vs-windows/#comment-7425</guid>
		<description>I prefer tabs but would it be possible to allow for dragging a window to a tab and vise-versa. I don't mean only one or the other but a mix both. In other words have a window with tabs and a window or windows without tabs existing at the same time. A windows could be dragged in converted to a tab and a tab could be dragged out converted to a window at will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer tabs but would it be possible to allow for dragging a window to a tab and vise-versa. I don&#8217;t mean only one or the other but a mix both. In other words have a window with tabs and a window or windows without tabs existing at the same time. A windows could be dragged in converted to a tab and a tab could be dragged out converted to a window at will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bymulker</title>
		<link>http://blog.rw-designer.com/2009/01/documents-vs-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-7417</link>
		<dc:creator>bymulker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 09:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rw-designer.com/2009/01/documents-vs-windows/#comment-7417</guid>
		<description>The tabbed interface would be better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tabbed interface would be better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msgmwrdn</title>
		<link>http://blog.rw-designer.com/2009/01/documents-vs-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-7416</link>
		<dc:creator>msgmwrdn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 21:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rw-designer.com/2009/01/documents-vs-windows/#comment-7416</guid>
		<description>The tabbed interface would be more efficent.  You could see what files you have open more readly and still be able to use the whole screen.  With the window within a window method you cant see what files your working with without shrinking the current window. With the multiple programs type the files grouped in tab is ok but I agree with the above comment about using to much of the systems resources. Tabs are great when combining and editing different files at the same time. Its like flipping between pages in a book</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tabbed interface would be more efficent.  You could see what files you have open more readly and still be able to use the whole screen.  With the window within a window method you cant see what files your working with without shrinking the current window. With the multiple programs type the files grouped in tab is ok but I agree with the above comment about using to much of the systems resources. Tabs are great when combining and editing different files at the same time. Its like flipping between pages in a book</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: legolegend4</title>
		<link>http://blog.rw-designer.com/2009/01/documents-vs-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-7414</link>
		<dc:creator>legolegend4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 01:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rw-designer.com/2009/01/documents-vs-windows/#comment-7414</guid>
		<description>Ya it would be way better and easier to use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya it would be way better and easier to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.rw-designer.com/2009/01/documents-vs-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-7412</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 00:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rw-designer.com/2009/01/documents-vs-windows/#comment-7412</guid>
		<description>TABED WOULD BE SO MUCH EASIER</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TABED WOULD BE SO MUCH EASIER</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
